Cases like this...

...bug the crap out of me:

NY Times Co. v United States 403 U.S. 713 (1971).

• Black, with whom Douglas joins, concurring
• Douglas, with whom Black joins, concurring
• Brennan, concurring
• Stewart, with whom White joins, concurring
• White, with whom Stewart joins, concurring
• Marshall, concurring
• Burger, dissenting
• Harlan, with whom Chief Justice and Blackmun join, dissenting
• Blackmun, dissenting

I really hope Prof doesn't start getting into, "now what would White say about that?"